Decoding the Security Ratings Scale

In the intricate realm of cybersecurity, the need to assess and communicate security effectiveness led to the development of security ratings scales. These scales distill complex security data into a comprehensible format, offering organizations insights into their cybersecurity posture. This article delves into the inner workings of the security ratings scale, shedding light on the factors that contribute to an organization’s overall security rating and understanding how these factors shape the assessment. 

At its core, a security ratings scale quantifies an organization’s security posture in a standardized manner. This numerical representation translates intricate security metrics into an accessible form, enabling stakeholders to gauge risk and make informed decisions. Explore more about goes into answering ‘What is a security risk rating?’ 

The security rating scale can be produced as numerical values (like a credit score) or alphabetic grades, with higher scores or grades indicating better cybersecurity practices and therefore lower cyber risk. The purpose of these scales is to provide a clear, objective, and consistent way to evaluate an organization’s enterprise risk, or vendor cyber risk, and compare the cybersecurity health of different entities where you can monitor their ratings trend over time- and compare to industry benchmarks. 

Read the Whitepaper

The Evolution of Cybersecurity Ratings and How They Can Boost Risk Visibility

Factors Influencing the Security Ratings Scale

The security ratings scale draws upon a multitude of factors, each contributing to the organization’s overall rating: 

  • Indicators of Compromise (IoCs): These are evidence of security breaches, such as malware infections, unauthorized access, or data breaches. The presence and severity of IoCs directly influence the rating. 
  • Observed Compromised Systems: The number of systems within an organization that show signs of compromise contributes to the overall assessment. The scale weighs the impact of compromised systems on the organization’s security. 
  • User Behavior and Security Diligence: The practices of employees and users in adhering to security policies and protocols impact the overall rating. Secure user behavior contributes positively to the rating, while risky behavior can lead to a decrease. 
  • Response to Emerging Threats: A swift and effective response to emerging threats and vulnerabilities is crucial. The scale evaluates how promptly the organization mitigates potential risks, influencing the final rating. 

Each of these factors is assigned a weight to reflect its relative importance in assessing the organization’s cybersecurity posture. This weighted data is then aggregated to generate an overall security rating. The methodology used to determine these weights varies between different rating platforms. 

FortifyData has made their security rating score methodology publicly available and is the only security rating provider with a patent pending on their configurable security rating risk rating models. Providing adjustable security ratings allows clients to create additional security rating models, in addition to the standard FortifyData score, focused on the factors and weightings of those factors in the score that best address the organization’s specific threat landscape. 

Relative Comparisons and Industry Benchmarks

Security ratings scales gain depth through relative comparisons. Organizations are often benchmarked against peers within the same industry. This contextual comparison provides a clearer understanding of the organization’s performance compared to similar entities, helping to gauge where improvements are needed. 

Accuracy and Data Quality

The accuracy and quality of the underlying data sources significantly impact the final rating. Inaccurate or outdated data can lead to a skewed assessment. Therefore, ensuring data accuracy and reliability is crucial for an accurate reflection of the organization’s security posture. 

Considerations and Limitations

While the security ratings scale offers valuable insights, it’s essential to recognize its limitations. The scale may not fully capture internal security practices and controls that are not publicly disclosed. Additionally, certain factors that contribute to security, such as encryption practices or employee training, may not be accurately reflected. 

 The security ratings scale offers a structured approach to evaluating an organization’s cybersecurity posture. By understanding the factors that shape the rating, organizations can gain insights into their strengths and vulnerabilities. A comprehensive assessment takes into account various elements, from indicators of compromise to user behavior, allowing organizations to make informed decisions to enhance their security strategy. Embracing the nuances of the security ratings scale empowers organizations to navigate the complex landscape of cybersecurity with a proactive and data-driven approach. 

Related Resources